| 这套丛书充分体现了美国法学教育以案例教学为主的特点，以法院判例作为教学内容，采用苏格拉底式的问答方法，在课堂上学生充分参与讨论。这就要求学生不仅要了解专题法律知识，而且要理解法律判决书。本套丛书结合案例设计的大量思考题，对提高学生理解概念、提高分析和解决问题的能力，非常有益。 |
|
|
| A Amanda Acquisition Corp.v.Universal Foods Corp Amanda Acquisition Corp.v.Universal Foods Corp Appraisal of Ford Holdings,Inc.Preferred Stock,In the Matter of Aronson v.Lewis B Baatz v.Arrow Bar Basic,Inc.v.Levinson Basic,Inc v.Levinson Birnbaum v.Newport Steel Corp Blackburn v.Witter Blasius lndustries,Inc.v.Atlas Corp Blount v.Taft Blue Chip Stamps v.Manor Drug Stores Bohatch v.Butle & Binion Broz v.Cellular Information Systems,Inc. Business Roundtable v.Securities and Exchange Comm’n C Caremark International Inc.Derivative Litigation,In re Carmody v.Toll Brothers,Inc CBl lndustries,Inc.v.Horon Cede & Company.v.Technicolor,Inc Centaur Partners,IV v.National Intergroup,Inc. Cheff v.Mathes Chiarella v.United States Cinerama,Inc.v.Technicolor,Inc Coggins v.New England Patriots Football Club,Inc. Committee for New Management of Guaranty Bancshares Corp.v.Dimeling Community Counselling Service,Inc.v.Reilly Concord Auto Auction,Inc.v.Rustion Conservative Caucus v.Cheveron Corp Consumer’s Co-op v.Olsen Covalt v.High Craig v.Lake Asbestos CTS Corp.v.Dynamics Corp.Of America D Dirks v.Securities and Exchange Comm’n Dodge v.Ford Motor Co Dolgoff v.Projectavision,Inc Donahue v.Rodd Electrotype Co. Dreifuerst v.Dreifuerst E Ernst & Ernst v.Hochfelder Essex Universal Corp.v.Yates Exxon Corp.v.Burglin F G H J K L M N O P R S T U V W Z |
内容加载中，请稍后...
商品评论（0条）