| 这套丛书充分体现了美国法学教育以案例教学为主的特点，以法院判例作为教学内容，采用苏格拉底式的问答方法，在课堂上学生充分参与讨论。这就要求学生不仅要了解专题法律知识，而且要理解法律判决书。本套丛书结合案例设计的大量思考题，对提高学生理解概念、提高分析和解决问题的能力，非常有益。 |
|
|
| A Anthony,In re Anthony Pools v.Sheehan Arabian Score V.Lasma Arabian Ltd Auclair,In re B Bank of America N.T.S.A.v.Sanati Bazak International Corp.v.Mast Industries,Ins Benedict v.Ratner Bowdoin v.Showell Growers,Inc C Canty v.Vermont National Bank Cate V.Dover Corp Central Washington Refrigeration,Inc.v.Barbee Chemical Bank v.Pic Motors Corp Cherwell-Ralli,Inc.v.Rytman Grain Co,Inc Cleveland v.Mcnabb Clovis National Bank v.Thomas Colonial Pacific Leasing Corp.v.Mcnatt Datronic Rental Corp Columbia Nitrogen Corp.v.Royster Co. Cook Specialty Co.v.Schrlock Cortan Banco Asuncion Paraguay v.Ocean Bank D Dale R.Horming Co.v. Falconer Glass Industries,Inc. Daniell v.Ford Motor Co. Diamond Fruit Growers,Inc.v.Krack Corp Dunfee V.Blue Rock Van & Storage,Inc E East River Steamship Corp.V. Transameria Delaval,Inc F Fabers,Inc,In re Falls Church Bank V.Wesley Heights Realty,Inc Farm Credit Bank of St.Paul V.F & A Dairy Farmers Cooperative Elevator Co.V.Union State Bank Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.V.Culver First American National Bank v.Christian Foundation Life Insurance Co First Bank & Trust Co.v.Post First National Bank and Trust Co.Of El Dorado V.Ford Motor Credit Co. First National Bank of Chicago v.Standard Bank & Trust Flippo v.Mode O’Day Frock Shops of Hollywood Floor v.Melvin Foster v.Knutson G H I J K L M N P R S T U V W |
内容加载中，请稍后...
商品评论（0条）